Note that Pasuk means verse, Pesukim means verses.
Classes of Pesukim
Pesukim Without a Clear Prior/Later Thematic Reference: Yoma 52a, 52b
Pesukim appearing Out of Order [iruv parshiyyot]: Yoma 71a; Sotah 3a
"Pesukim of Chayyim [Life]": Yoma 71a
Repetitious phraseology: Bava Metzia 31a-b
Pesukim which present only names, with no apparent deeper meaning: Gittin 7a
Pesukim which present "Good Advice [Eitzah Tovah]," not legal rulings: Gittin 22b
Pesukim which are to be read in an abnormal fashion, to add a layer of meaning ["Al Tikrei"]: Eruvin 54a, 54b; Rosh HaShanah 3a; Succah 35a; Megillah 13a, 15b, 25b, 28a; Kiddushin 30b; Sotah 5a, 10a-b, 12a, 12b, 13b; Niddah 13a
Pesukim with meanings which, if not for the fact that the verse stated them, it would be impossible to suggest them: Eruvin 22a; Rosh HaShanah 17b; Megillah 21a
Analysis of a Pasuk
Not extrapolating from a specific case's law to similar cases, if two pesukim teach it for specific cases [shnei ketuvin haba'in k'echad]: Yoma 60a; Pesachim 26a, 45a; Kiddushin 24a, 34b [2x], 35a [2x], 37b; Zevachim 23b-24a, 46a; Keritot 6a
Not Extrapolating from a specific case's law, if three pesukim teach it for specific cases: Kiddushin 35a; Zevachim 23b-24a
The pasuk altered its language, to teach the importance of a specific feature of a mitzvah ["Shinah Alav HaKatuv Li'Akev"]: Yoma 51b; Pesachim 61a; Zevachim 23a, 23b
How to analyze a pasuk which could be understood leniently or stringently: Kiddushin 20a
A pasuk which uses excess verbiage to convey a simple detail: Megillah 11a
Only extrapolating the minimal lesson possible [as in "Tafasta Merubah Lo Tafasta"]: Rosh HaShanah 4b; Yoma 80a; Succah 5a, 5b [2x]; Kiddushin 17a [2x]; Zevachim 55a
[Not] needing a pasuk to teach that an entity whose 'membership' in a certain class is in doubt isn't subject to a law that applies to that class: Chagigah 4a; Keritot 21a
Understanding a pasuk's subject based on the gender used in the pasuk: Zevachim 43b
When a Pasuk compares X to Y, the greater of the two is Y [Katan Nitleh b'Gadol]: Taanit 7a
A Pasuk applies to all cases in its purview: Pesachim 14a
A Pasuk which teaches a law brings multiple examples in order to show that there is separate liability for violation of the law involving each of the examples: Keritot 4a
When a pasuk mentions multiple cases and then a law which can apply to only one of them, do we understand the law to refer to the first case it mentioned, or to the case it mentioned right next to the law: Zevachim 28a
Using cantillation notes (trop) to interpret pesukim: Chagigah 6b
"Shavkeih LeKera DeHu Dachik, UMokim ANafsheih"-Leave the Pasuk, which is difficult to interpret, and understand it in this [difficult] way: Pesachim 59b
Learning the subject of a pasuk as a reference to subjects discussed prior or later in that pasuk, or both [mikra nidrash lefanav/le'acharav]: Rosh HaShanah 9b; Kiddushin 15b; Zevachim 24a-b; R. Berachot 5a "U'Lechumei"
Extrapolating a lesson from the way a pasuk changes its subject in mid-sentence: Keritot 11a
Extrapolating a Pasuk's meaning based upon earlier [Elyon] or later [Tachton] Pesukim: Kiddushin 14b; Keritot 22b; Zevachim 48a
Understanding a Pasuk to add a layer to an existing Prohibition, instead of referring elsewhere: Pesachim 24a-b
We would prefer to find another reference to another Pasuk, if possible, rather than use it to add a layer of Prohibition: Pesachim 24b
If one Pasuk's wording indicates to add elements and one indicates to exclude, which way to learn: Rosh HaShanah 9b
Understanding a Pasuk as a Blessing, and not deeper: Rosh HaShanah 11a
Extrapolating from the first appearance of a Pasuk as well as its other iterations, if it is repeated excessively: Succah 6b
Interpreting a Pasuk to refer to an event out of order because that is the logical reading: Sotah 3a
Will Yom Kippur atone for a megaleh panim batorah shelo k'halachah: one who deduces lessons insulting the Torah, from the Torah: Yoma 85b; Keritot 7a
Biblical Pesukim Referring to Future Events
Analysis of the Biblical Term "Almanah [Widow]" as referring to a relevant Rabbinic Institution: Ketuvot 10b
Reference to Assyria by the Chidekel River: Ketuvot 10b
Biblical Pesukim where the Talmud had a different Edition than we have
"VeYabeshet Yadav Yatzaru", ours has "Yadav" Spelled Out Fully: Ketuvot 5a
The Talmud citing a Pasuk which doesn't exist: Eruvin 18b, 65a