Bill Validation

A Challenge to a Bill of Divorce

Rules of Non-Bait Din Testimony

Rules of Testimony in Court

Procedure for Presentation of Testimony

Court's Stamp of Approval [Hanpek] for a Bill, and Validation of Bills

Claiming that the Bill was of an invalid type: See the listings in Bills

Requiring 2 witnesses: Gittin 3a

Validation of Bills as a Rabbinic institution: Ketuvot 21b, 28a

Where the Bill has something wrong with it: Bava Metzia 12b

Recognizing their Signatures: Ketuvot 18b

Invalidating the original testimony of their Signatures: Ketuvot 18b

Need for Proof, where the defendant admits having written it: Shabbat 78b-79a, Ketuvot 19a, Bava Metzia 7a, 12b-14a, 72a-b

If Verifiers Claim that the original testimony was invalid: Ketuvot 19b-20a

If the Witnesses claim that there was an unfulfilled Condition: Ketuvot 19b

If One Witness says there was a Condition, and one argues: Ketuvot 19b

Having each Witness verify his signature and his partner's: Ketuvot 20b-21a

If you only have each Witness verifying his own signature: Ketuvot 20b-21a

Considering signatures to be verification, in themselves, as though we knew that their testimony was examined in court: Gittin 3a

If they say that the Witnesses weren't Valid: Ketuvot 19b

Above case, but where other proof of the signatures exists: Ketuvot 19b

If one of the Witnesses dies, how many are needed to verify his signature: Ketuvot 21a

If one of the Verifiers knows the signature from when he was a minor, where the signator was his Father/Rebbe/Brother: Ketuvot 28a

Requiring that the other Bill be verified separately in Court: Ketuvot 20a

Requiring that their signatures appear on 2 Unchallenged Bills from the Sale of Land which was then held for 3 years: Ketuvot 20a

Requiring that the Verification Bill be from a Third Party: Ketuvot 20a

Writing out the Signature, for future verification: Ketuvot 21a



Back to Home

Search by Category

Search by Google WWW Webshas

Alphabetical Index

About WebShas